The Incredible True Adventures of Dad
The house I grew up in was a tiny thing, 1100 square feet, but it seemed like a palace full of surprises. I suspect that was due in no small part to the mountains of books stacked to the rafters in every room of our house. When my stepmother and Dad remodeled and updated the creaky old lady, they built bookshelves that went from floor to ceiling in three rooms, every nook and cranny packed with enormous tomes. All the other rooms had books or periodicals crammed willy-nilly in corners, on our built-ins, over tables. There was no room left tidy; there were just too many damned books.
There was rhyme and some small reason to the order, though at times flexible to interpretation. The living room was devoted to art and art history books, a collection which many universities would envy. The foyer (wasted space in such a tiny house until the shelves went in) was the overflow, an annex for books that didn’t have an easy home elsewhere in the collection. The upstairs hall, another completely impractical room that created a sort of bizarre catwalk around the stair case, housed literature from the classics to the absolute trashiest fluff, including the collected pulp novels about Tarzan the Apeman. I liked them for their risque and ridiculous cover art, Tarzan shouting in agony over the limp body of a scantily clad Jane.
In this environment, Dad was all-knowing. I suppose that’s nothing new to anyone who’s ever had a parent (!); parents seem omniscient, as if they can see around corners, and know all the answers from the mundane to arcane. And they definitely seem right most of the time, even if one doesn’t like it. I think Dad’s grandeur was bolstered with the rather imperious stacks of knowledge that crowded every surface, his stage set behind him at all times, encouraging one to think, “Good grief, with all this to back him up, how could I ever doubt him?”
I flipped through dozens of art books, though none of it really stuck. I saw the words “Dada” and “Baroque” on the spines of books and couldn’t have told you the difference, but I knew that Dad knew intimately and could have waxed a rather lengthy bit on either. He knew about literature, history, art, who wrote what and when, where they came from, how they painted, and why (or why they weren’t) famous. Dad swam in his ocean of books, and I was in a dinghy puddling about, surrounded by all the knowledge (and some of the kitsch) that helped give Dad a sagacity that I was pretty awed by.
There was a funky little antique bookcase in the hall, stuck in one of the many useless corners. A musty old thing, but I loved it. It had transom glass doors that hinged upward and revealed a collection of books from Dad’s childhood: Robin Hood, King Arthur, Treasure Island, all lavishly illustrated by N.C Wyeth and preserved with their dust jackets worn but still protective of their masters. This was the swashbuckling section, with love, tragedy, adventure and heroics all represented as if out of history. I never read them, though I know my brother did, but the bookcase held some sway over me; I knew that it was important, if only because it represented time and what had gone before.
That this represented Dad’s childhood possibly never registered in my proto-brain; Dad was always the academician thumbing through his collections, searching through archives for his next syllabi. He was never a child to me, though he told us stories of someone who shared his name in the distant past. The notion of his childhood was irrelevant; children are always creatures of immediacy and any past before their own time is as alien and unreal as any story in a book.
When Dad got ill and was closing up like a fallen leaf, he was increasingly watching old movies. Musicals, sometimes, but mostly swashbucklers or dramas from when he was a kid. He needed to not be too challenged, an instinct I understand just from having the flu or a common cold. No heavy lifting, no Ingmar Bergman films. No subtitles, no moral ambiguity. True evil versus true heroism, and even if the antagonists are more likable than the heroes, the resolution is fair. I recognized too that it was the solace of his youth, the tales that saved him from his insufferable mother and his somewhat lonely childhood, the sanctuary to which he could retreat and be embraced by old friends and foes.
In my helpless way, not knowing what to do other than squire him from doctor to medical device and home, I gave him the Harry Potter books to read, trying to fill his need for delivery from the betrayal of his body. It’s not Ullyses, but it’s a good yarn, as they say. And it seemed to fill the bill for the great wonders of literature, the magical tales that have the ability to transport without making you work too hard for the trip.
He devoured them one after the other, and I could sense his childlike glee with each plot twist and evil machination. He was particularly delighted and horrified by Professor Umbridge, the bureaucratic sadist who delivers Hogwarts not to ultimate evil, but the evil of busywork and petty tyranny; I suspect he was reminded of his last years as a professor himself, increasingly subjected to staff meetings and committees which had no aim but the bottom line and obscured the sole purpose of higher learning: to teach people how to think for themselves.
I still don’t know what to do most of the time, but I bought the Harry Potter movies so that we could watch them together. We saw one the other night and as we watched I could feel him squirming next to me, either in sympathy for our beleaguered heroes, or admonition toward the antagonists, just as he must have when he was a child absorbed by his Robin Hood‘s and Robinson Crusoe‘s. And I don’t have too many other cards up my sleeve, but for once I gave my Dad something special that could transport him away from his travails, if only for a while.
Popularity: 8% [?]


Q, thank you for your latest entry and jogging my memory of your home on Spruce in Boulder. I spent some time there and I remember it as you do – a conservatory for plants, music, literature, art, beauty, and delicious meals. It wasn’t architectural digest material but it was a safe, warm, creative, stimulating, nurturing and loving environment. Of course it was, how could it ber anything other?
Love,
Carol
It was tiny! I can’t believe how small it was either; I drove by a few years ago and almost plotzed. It seemed too small by half to contain all the life we had in it, and I’m not sure I believe Dad when he tells me my room was 10 x 11! Now THAT is small!
Where did we put all that crap??? No storage to speak of either, which explains the installation of massive bookshelves, but doesn’t explain our oversight of storage for things like, say, clothes, or, um. Linens. You know, the OTHER necessities!
Miss you, bean. Wish the little nippers could meet each other! Mine reads Consumer Reports at five–how’s yours?
Ah, the horsey milkbox! That thing gave me the vapors! I swear, it was right out of some creepy Terry Gilliam meets “Jason IV, Return of the Ghastly” movie. I’m sure the doll head on the box will rear out of my psyche when I’m least prepared for it someday.
As to the creaky plant stand, it never broke so no harm, no foul! And we never had to get tetanus shots from impaling ourselves on its rusty bits, so YAY! I thought it was lovely–hairy, dusty cacti and all.
I love you Pop…Thank goodness for books if they made you what you are.
Was it really so small?!? I know we were smaller then, doing ballet leaps across the house, but that house looms so large in my memories: books to the ceiling, the long distance between front room and kitchen (I think of it as a hall, though I know it was the dining room), the kingdom of QB and Chris that was upstairs. a home, truly.
love, bean
Hi Q. Thank you for your latest entry–you’ve caught the house and its ambiance nicely, and you’ve uncovered a part of my secret life as a vicarious swashbuckler–indeed those old movies, which I saw in 2nd and 3rd run movie houses as a kid, were one of my escapes from the smothering clutches of Mom, and even closer to hand were the books, the Stevenson, the Cooper, Scott, knights in armor, pirates, later on Kipling, and even Joyce and Dostoyevski, thanks to the timely intervention of some insightful teachers. Ironically it was Mom I have to thank for so bountifully supplying me with many of those books. Thanks, Mom. Lately I’ve also been going through old photos and slides and rediscovering some of the items in those corners. Remember the horsy-milkbox that used to share space in the hall with the Victorian secretary and the wobbly glass and iron plantstand? What must your little friends have thought of that? I just finished reading Julian Barnes’ Nothing To Be Afraid Of, (sent me last XMas by Carol) his meditation on death and issues of mortality. I have to say your blog is right up there in quality, tone, humor, insight. Thank you so much. Love, Papa-san
reading backwards, but no never mind. wonderful evocation of spruce street. ah, that peculiar upstairs hall, and yes booksbooksbooks. When i met charles, he was that walking bibliography that blew my undergraduate sophomoric mind away. And i loved that house. i see you, Q, backlit, thumping from kitchen to front room to meet me when i arrived in 1970. you were very blonde and those huge blue eyes, and friendly curiosity caught my heart immediately.
It was definitely NOT Architectural Digest, but it looms large in my imagination. It pokes up in vivid detail in my dreams–I can even remember some of the junk crammed in corners sometimes!
It was a great little house…
Thanks, Bets. That house was truly a wonder, though hard to believe it was that small. We had hardly any money but it was filled with life and brains, so that’s what I remember.
It was a great house, even with all its idiosyncrasies. Perhaps because of them.